As I've mentioned now and then, Udo Schuklenk and I are working on a book called 50 Great Myths About Atheism - to be published in 2013, I hope, if all goes as well as it might.
Documenting that these myths really are out there is one of the more difficult tasks, since we can't always recall the provenance of something that we know very well and certainly have no reason to doubt. Accordingly, it's kind of Time magazine to provide us with an article that is full of such myths.
Jerry Coyne has already done a good hatchet job on the article, which really is pretty terrible. It's full of tired, cliched thoughts.
I especially like: "It's a fairly widely accepted maxim that atheist fundamentalists, as I call them, can be just as intolerant as religious fundamentalists." Right, that so-called "maxim" might be "widely accepted" in the sense that there are a lot of gullible people who think such a thing. Even smart people might accept it if they told often enough that's true and haven't got the time or energy to check for themselves. None of us can stop and check out everything we're told. Nonetheless, the "maxim" is drivel.
It's unworthy of the author to write such rubbish as this, and of a supposedly high quality magazine to publish it.
3 comments:
"Jerry Coyne has already done a good hatchet job on the article"
I think this is a misuse of the term 'hatchet job'. Which I take to be a critical, one sided article about an individual.
Perhaps "debunking" or "fisking" would be better?
Happy Christmas!
Hmmm,don't some articles deserve hatchet jobs? Dunno.
This guy is just, in the word of William James, rearranging his prejudices.
Post a Comment