Australian philosopher, literary critic, legal scholar, and professional writer. Based in Newcastle, NSW. My latest books are THE TYRANNY OF OPINION: CONFORMITY AND THE FUTURE OF LIBERALISM (2019) and AT THE DAWN OF A GREAT TRANSITION: THE QUESTION OF RADICAL ENHANCEMENT (2021).
Mike LaBossiere has an interesting thread going on over at Talking Philosophy - and I just made a longish comment. This argument can be a sore point with many people, one way or the other, but see what you think.
It evidently is with the original poster - who has been going through a divorce. I'd say that divorce settlements are a very sore point with many people.
3 comments:
You guys crack me up. :D This is a sore point?
It evidently is with the original poster - who has been going through a divorce. I'd say that divorce settlements are a very sore point with many people.
I have to say that I like your take. Reading the post, and more so the Quigley link, I was led to ask what these folks thought the arrangement was.
Post a Comment