When the debate is televised and/or available as a video on the site, you can make up your own mind as to why the outcome was as it was and what lessons can be learned about what the theists did wrong, what the atheists did right, and what both sides could have done better. There are written versions of the speeches now available on the ABC Religion and Ethics Portal, but of course they may not exactly match what was said on the night and might not give a very good picture of the cut and thrust of the actual debate. If you read them, try the actual order of delivery on the night: Longstaff (introduction), Jensen, Pataki, Rowland, Caro, Stephens, Blackford.
In any event, the figure for people for supporting the motion that "Atheists are wrong" actually dropped by 0.5 per cent after the debate. The figure for people opposing the motion increased by 10.0 per cent:
Pre-debate poll Post-debate poll For: 28.5% 28% Undecided: 15.5% 6% Against: 56% 66%
4 comments:
Hi Russell, I haven't read all of the pieces from this debate as yet, but I have skimmed over the pieces by Pataki, Jensen and Rowland, and watched as Dave (the happy) Singer live-tweeted it. But I think your piece nailed it on the head. Thanks for this.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FridgeLogic sets in.
Well, sorry about that.
Apparently there's some cut-off
at the right hand side of
comments. At least on my monitor.
That should be "FridgeLogic".
Some, ahem, interesting comments on the various pieces...
Post a Comment