These three detailed posts over the past couple of years, all by Massimo Pigliucci, are well worth reading.
Elsewhere, Pigliucci has been critical of the "New Atheist" arguments of Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris. In these posts, however, he is as sharply critical of Fish and the latter's slippery defence of religion - based on a form of epistemic relativism or epistemological scepticism - as you could ask for from any of the "New Atheists".
2 comments:
On a completely irrelevant note, I thought you might enjoy this.
The never ending debate: science versus religion. It is boring.
Post a Comment