I'm realistic enough to be aware that my various careers to date have been relatively mediocre. I have an entry in Wikipedia based on the fact that I have some books with proper-sized commercial print-runs, which is one of the standard criteria they use over there. I also have an entry in Who's Who in Australia based on totally different criteria relating to my work in labour relations. It's not as if I've been world-beating in either field, though I did do some good work as a fiction writer and also as an industrial advocate. Ironically, what I think may be my best and most important work - the large body of substantial articles on public policy issues published over the past decade or so, mostly in Quadrant but also in Meanjin and more recently in refereed journals - would not be enough to cut it in either of these places.
What provokes these reflections is that I received an invitation overnight from the international Who's Who to provide my details. I'm not sure how that came about - e.g. did someone who knows me submit my name, or do they scour publications like Who's Who in Australia, or what? I spent most of the morning filling in the on-line form, which made a helluva lot of demands on my memory. This doesn't necessarily mean that I'll be appearing there, but, oh well, we'll see what comes of it.
1 comment:
Very cool design! Useful information. Go on! slots Spyblocs 20 zoloft http://www.bed-mattress-somma-water-bed.info Descubrimiento ultram mobile phone tools accutane 200 horsepower air cooled volkswagen engine Secured low interest credit card deal Free no downloadonline slot machines Free web hosting dedicated server online information pda accessory Cheats for need for speed porsche 2000 Mileage deduction tax rate lcd screen checker Online casinos credit card declined Aluminum awnings miami Pics and information on jenna jameson 1997 ford motors 4.2 liter for sale
Post a Comment