tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24761391.post7366625026716595288..comments2023-10-26T22:06:11.166+11:00Comments on Metamagician3000: Sunday supervillainy - Marvel NOW taking shapeRussell Blackfordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12431324430596809958noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24761391.post-20873733776891245262012-08-08T04:09:22.526+10:002012-08-08T04:09:22.526+10:005000 whining atheists vs the Great Prophet
ottawa...5000 whining atheists vs the Great Prophet<br /><br />ottawaskeptics.org/forum?func=view&id=4560&catid=3<br /><br />add some comment moderation to your BSAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07697721850534805519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24761391.post-48289157306172516222012-08-06T01:06:49.396+10:002012-08-06T01:06:49.396+10:00Like The New 52, the Marvel NOW thing is just shuf...Like The New 52, the Marvel NOW thing is just shuffling the deck chairs (whether on the Titanic or on a less-doomed boat is up for debate). At least Marvel respects their fans enough to let the continuity they've been following for years or decades to be unaltered.<br /><br />I'm not excited, per se, about Hickman's Avengers and New Avengers, where everyone is an Avenger now, including some version of Jean Grey and Cyclops. (Spoilers.) I'm somewhat interested in Uncanny Avengers, largely because of Havok, and I also like Rogue and Wanda. It's hardly a decision for me to pass on Bendis's All-New X-Men, which is apparently the original 1960s team in the modern Marvel era (because comics). The other titles teased so far are just new creative line ups on existing titles.Rocket Stegosaurushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18392640284912482674noreply@blogger.com